<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WF7T - Amateur Radio Station &#187; eQSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wf7t.net/archives/tag/eqsl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wf7t.net</link>
	<description>In a blind taste test, poor quality Ham is indistinguishable from Spam [+] Scott Perry (my friend)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bands and Modes to Date</title>
		<link>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/259</link>
		<comments>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/259#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WF7T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eQSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTTY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wf7t.net/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/259/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QSL Return Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/3</link>
		<comments>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WF7T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eQSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LoTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QSL Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wf7t.net/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eQSL confirmation rate:  26% LoTW confirmation rate:  46% If CQ is serious about using eQSL for the confirmation campaigns for their primary awards, the participation better step up.  The Triple Play Award has stepped up the usage of LoTW.  Learning curve is steep, but second nature once you get the freakin’ hang of the certificate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/3/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On QSLing</title>
		<link>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/61</link>
		<comments>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/61#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WF7T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chewing the Rag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eQSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feld Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JT65A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LoTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper Chasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QSL Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wf7t.net/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am having a new batch of QSLs printed up.  I am taking a multi-pronged approach, and trying a couple of vendors this time. 1.  I am a big fan of custom QSLs, and having a graphic designer wife (very expensive in the form of shoes and handbags) it is quite achievable for me.  My [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wf7t.net/archives/61/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

